Welcome!

Security is a Holistic Proposition

Gorka Sadowski

Subscribe to Gorka Sadowski: eMailAlertsEmail Alerts
Get Gorka Sadowski via: homepageHomepage mobileMobile rssRSS facebookFacebook twitterTwitter linkedinLinkedIn


Top Stories by Gorka Sadowski

These past few weeks, I published several blogs pointing out problems with static rule-based correlation, their current limitations, their high TCO, etc. Because these solutions have been sold for many years as the be all and end all to security problems, it has created false expectations in the industry and among clients. But SIEM as a general discipline holds plenty of promises, so let's not throw the baby with the bathwater. Let's think of static rule-based correlation as the engine for the first generation of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Looking in my crystal ball, the future of SIEM is probably going to use lots of "Business Intelligence"-like tools and methodologies, instantiated to security issues. These self-learning systems use mathematic modeling, statistical approaches and data mining primitives to establish patterns of usage, and r... (more)

Conclusion: Why Rule-Based Log Correlation Is Almost a Good Idea...

During these past few weeks, we have looked at several reasons why a static rule based correlation is not the "SOC in a Box", end-all be all that many thought it was. Indeed what to think about a "solution" that: Can only address a very limited set of attack scenarios Requires meticulous consideration on how to map out the few selected attack scenarios Doesn't guarantee you to catch attacks in progress even when one of the few selected scenario is taking place Obliges you to think of minute details to slightly reduce false positives Yields hundreds and thousands of basic correlat... (more)

Why Rule-Based Log Correlation Is Almost a Good Idea... (Part 6 - APTs)

APTs, Advanced Persistent Threats, are the anti-script-kiddies approach to penetrating an environment. Can static rule-based correlation catch these? APT Attackers Love Correlation Environments You remember that "False Sense of Security," the feeling that you are secure, but in fact you're not...? Attackers know that an attack is a process, it is not an event. And they use this - and they use time - to their advantage. They use time scales that static rule-based correlation simply cannot cope with. If you want to correlate disparate events, you need to keep state information on th... (more)

Why Rule-Based Log Correlation Is Almost a Good Idea... Part 4

We saw what typically happens when trying to use static rule-based log correlation to perform real-time incident management... combinatory explosion and lack of scalability. How do you automate non-deterministic attacks in a few discrete steps??? Today, we'll look at more scenarios for which static rule-based log correlation doesn't make sense. Attack Scenario Example 2: Brute Force Attack Let's look at another example scenario. Brute Force Attack. - A user tries to log in to his account - He fails many times in a row and then finally succeeds - Then "probably" a successful Brute ... (more)

Why Rule-Based Log Correlation Is Almost a Good Idea...

Rule-based log correlation is almost a good idea. It sounds like a good idea, it appears to be a good idea and many people will tell you it's a good idea, but in fact it is not. Rule-based log correlation is very complex, limited in use and applicability, and boasts a terrible ROI. It will give you a false sense of security, which is a bad thing. We'll look at the reasons why this is not a good idea, and some ways to augment the use of logs to improve your security through pragmatic Risk Management. History of Logs What is rule-based log correlation and how did it come about? Ru... (more)